Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”

Jasmin Joecks, Kerstin Pull, Karin Vetter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The under-representation of women on boards is a heavily discussed topic—not only in Germany. Based on critical mass theory and with the help of a hand-collected panel dataset of 151 listed German firms for the years 2000–2005, we explore whether the link between gender diversity and firm performance follows a U-shape. Controlling for reversed causality, we find evidence for gender diversity to at first negatively affect firm performance and—only after a “critical mass” of about 30 % women has been reached—to be associated with higher firm performance than completely male boards. Given our sample firms, the critical mass of 30 % women translates into an absolute number of about three women on the board and hence supports recent studies on a corresponding “magic number” of women in the boardroom.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-72
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume118
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this